Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder. First, people should know the history of the death penalty.
The death penalty has a long history dating back to the 16th Century BC. “In 16th Century BC Egypt, a death sentence was ordered for members of nobility, who were accused of magic. They were ordered to take their own life. The non-nobility was usually killed with an ax”(Burns). During the 18th Century BC, King Hammurabi of Babylon had a code that arranged the death penalty for 25 different crimes although murder was not one of them (Burns). The very first legal executions came in the United States was during the Revolutionary War against Great Britain.
British soldiers hung the first person to die by the death penalty, Nathan Hale, for espionage (Farrell). The reason that I have included this history is to prove that if something has been working, why stop this from working. Some people say that sending the murderers to death row is inhumane because these people deserve a right to live. This is wrong because they have given up their right to live for the horrible and heinous crimes they committed. There also has been the problem of overcrowding in prisons and Jails. Some people ay that this is a problem but having more Jails built will solve this problem.
Having more prisons or Jails built may help solve the problem but the death penalty effectively stops draining more money from the taxpayers to house murderers. These murderers get three warm meals a day; they do nothing all day, and have a place to sleep Just because the taxpayers fund these facilities. Murderers on death row do not deserve to get a place to stay. They deserve to get their life taken away from them because of the atrocious crimes that these criminals have done. The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder.
Many people’s greatest fear is death; therefore if they know that death is a possible consequence for their actions, they are less likely to perform such actions. The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years. Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. This argument is refuted by Immanuel Kant who put forth the idea that, “a society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody ot properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime.
The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. Hundreds of murderers upon release have shed blood again. If they had been executed, their new victims would still be alive today. Paroled Murderer Kenneth McDuff escaped execution and upon release killed 12 others. Execution maximizes public safety through incapacitation, it prevents a murderer from ever murdering again, it protects the community from further bloodshed.
Is there a worse fate than an innocent person being executed for a crime he did not commit? Yes there is, it would be worse yet to be an innocent person who is brutally murdered by a murderer whom the state released rather then executed. Forensic science, which include extremely accurate identification of genetic material such as hair, skin, sperm, blood make it near too impossible for a wrongful conviction. Go home after hearing this speech, and think to yourself, if someone killed your family, what would you want done?